Posted On: April 22, 2008 by Steven R. Merican

Dressed Up Abuse Standard For Review Of Sanctions Order

An unhappy customer sued an auto dealership, and the dealership’s incorporator. The incorporator moved to dismiss and for sanctions. The dismissal was granted, but the sanctions motion was denied. In affirming the denial of sanctions, the First District Illinois Appellate Court embellished the typical “abuse of discretion” standard. “On review, we must decide whether the trial court's decision was ‘informed, based on valid reasons, and followed logically from the circumstances of the case.’”

The whole case, Dismuke v. Rand Cook Auto Sales, No. 1-06-3000 (12/26/07), is available by clicking here.

Bookmark: Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Google.com Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at del.icio.us Digg Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Digg.com Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Spurl.net Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Simpy.com Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at NewsVine Blink this Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at blinklist.com Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Furl.net Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at reddit.com Fark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Fark.com Bookmark Dressed%20Up%20Abuse%20Standard%20For%20Review%20Of%20Sanctions%20Order at Yahoo! MyWeb